Rotation Matrix
Definition
Consider an arbitrary vector \(\mathbf{x} \in \mathbb{R}^3\) and two frames \(F_\alpha\) and \(F_\beta\) with a common origin. \(\mathbf{R}^{\beta}_{\alpha} \in SO(3)\) represents a rotation matrix from \(F_\alpha\) to \(F_\beta\).
Representation | Attitude | Rotation |
---|---|---|
Rotation Function | Passive, i.e., the function of the rotation operator is on the frames | Active, i.e., the function of the rotation operator is on the vectors |
Rotation Operator | \(\mathbf{x}^\beta = \mathbf{R}^\beta_\alpha \mathbf{x}^\alpha\) | \(\mathbf{x}' = \mathbf{R} \mathbf{x}\) |
Cross Relationship | \(\mathbf{R}_{\text{active}} = \mathbf{R}^T_{\text{passive}}\) | |
Inverse Transformation | \(\mathbf{R}^{\alpha}_{\beta} = \left(\mathbf{R}^{\beta}_{\alpha} \right)^T = \left(\mathbf{R}^{\beta}_{\alpha} \right)^{-1}\) | |
Composition | \(\mathbf{R}^{\gamma}_{\alpha} = \mathbf{R}^{\gamma}_{\beta} \mathbf{R}^{\beta}_{\alpha}\) | |
Resolving Axes Transformation | Given a linear transformation matrix \(\mathbf{M}\), \(\mathbf{M}^{\beta} = \mathbf{R}^{\beta}_{\alpha} \mathbf{M}^{\alpha} \mathbf{R}^{\alpha}_{\beta}\) | |
Principal Rotation Matrices | Given an angle \(\left( \cdot \right) = \left( \cdot \right)_{\beta \alpha}\) which is the angle from \(F_\beta\) to \(F_\alpha\) around a specific principle axis, the principal rotation matrices describing the rotation \(\mathbf{R}^\alpha_\beta\) are \(\begin{align*} \mathbf{R}_3(\psi) &= \left[ \begin{array}{ccc} \text{cos}(\psi) & \text{sin}(\psi) & 0 \\ -\text{sin}(\psi) & \text{cos}(\psi) & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 1 \end{array} \right] \\ \mathbf{R}_2(\theta) &= \left[ \begin{array}{ccc} \text{cos}(\theta) & 0 & -\text{sin}(\theta) \\ 0 & 1 & 0 \\ \text{sin}(\theta) & 0 & \text{cos}(\theta) \end{array} \right] \\ \mathbf{R}_1(\phi) &= \left[ \begin{array}{ccc} 1 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & \text{cos}(\phi) & \text{sin}(\phi) \\ 0 & -\text{sin}(\phi) & \text{cos}(\phi) \end{array} \right] \\ \end{align*}\) | |
Time Derivative | \(\begin{align*} \dot{\mathbf{R}}^\alpha_\beta(t) &= - \mathbf{R}^\alpha_\beta \boldsymbol{\Omega}^\beta_{\beta \alpha} = \mathbf{R}^\alpha_\beta \boldsymbol{\Omega}^\beta_{\alpha \beta} \\ &= -\boldsymbol{\Omega}^\alpha_{\beta \alpha} \mathbf{R}^\alpha_\beta = \boldsymbol{\Omega}^\alpha_{\alpha \beta} \mathbf{R}^\alpha_\beta \end{align*}\) |
Covariance Transformation
Consider a state vector \(\mathbf{x} \in \mathbb{R}^6\) with a covariance matrix \(\mathbf{P} \in \mathbb{R}^{6 \times 6}\). The covariance is defined as:
If there has been a state transformation such that:
with \(\mathbf{M} \in \mathbb{R}^{6 \times 6}\), then the transformed covariance becomes:
Proofs
Proof - Principle Rotations
Let the coordinates of the vector \(\mathbf{p}\) be \(\left[\begin{array}{ccc} x^\beta & y^\beta & z^\beta \end{array} \right]^T\) in \(F_\beta\) and \(\left[\begin{array}{ccc} x^\alpha & y^\alpha & z^\alpha \end{array} \right]^T\) in \(F_\alpha\). Consider a case when \(F_\alpha\) is rotated by \(\psi\) about the principle 3-axis and a point \(P\) as shown in Figure 1.
In \(F_\beta\) and \(F_\alpha\), the coordinates of \(P\) are:
Hence, the relationship between the two coordinate frames is:
Proof - Poisson
If \(F_{\alpha}\) is rotating with respect to a stationary reference frame, \(F_\beta\), then:
Since the rotation of \(F_{\alpha}\) from \(t\) to \(t + \delta t\) is infinitesimal, using small angle approximation and assuming \(\boldsymbol{\omega}^{\alpha}_{\beta \alpha}\) is constant:
Substituting equation (\(\ref{3.8}\)) into equation (\(\ref{3.6}\)), we get:
which is the Poisson's equation.
Note that if the above steps are repeated under the assumption that \(F_\beta\) is rotating and \(F_\alpha\) is stionary, the result \(\dot{\mathbf{R}}^\alpha_\beta = -\mathbf{R}^\alpha_\beta \boldsymbol{\Omega}^\beta_{\beta \alpha}\) is obtained. However, the results are equivalent.
References
- Groves, P., Principles of GNSS, Inertial, and Multisensor Integrated Navigation Systems, Second Edition